<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TZGQT &#187; Audio-Video Streaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tzgqt.com/category/audio-video-streaming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tzgqt.com</link>
	<description>Technology Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Peer To Peer File Sharing Ethics</title>
		<link>http://tzgqt.com/peer-to-peer-file-sharing-ethics.html</link>
		<comments>http://tzgqt.com/peer-to-peer-file-sharing-ethics.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio-Video Streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tzgqt.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peer-to-peer file sharing as illegal theft, the work of the artist or an appropriate reward for the listeners or viewers for the money they have paid for these artists, where they are. Which side is different depending on whether you use a drug or an artist addled consumers for overpriced ripped sick piece of plastic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peer-to-peer file sharing as illegal theft, the work of the artist or an appropriate reward for the listeners or viewers for the money they have paid for these artists, where they are. Which side is different depending on whether you use a drug or an artist addled consumers for overpriced ripped sick piece of plastic or tape.<span id="more-212"></span></p>
<p>Do not take me the wrong way, because not all the artists and actors are taking drugs, but many are. Many others, a good job but we are still paying for the excesses of what I have for the majority, not the minority.</p>
<p>Most people make a balance, and may be the frustration of the artist and filmmaker whose work is being downloaded without payment possible. However, they are also the views of consumers, has paid a sum of money over the years, stars, a lifestyle, rather than their abilities. It is requested that the injustice that many people think that pop and film stars have had enough of the hard work of mass, and should not complain if some entirely legal, a software system Download some of its so-called &#8220;work&#8221;, but illegal.</p>
<p>Peer-to-peer file sharing is not illegal software: it is how we use it, the illegals. Many new acts complain, if we download their work, because they known, but as soon as it is known, and they no longer need us, they complain. That to me, if hypocrisy, I am ready for the arguments of those who do not.</p>
<p>It seems strange that the groups were unknown until they are free downloads of their work, the appeal against the fans were at the beginning of their music downloads. Is this useful? Or am I missing something? To me, they are only Prats, the exploration back into the hole in the ramp.</p>
<p>Many say that until those who have the money to music and movies continue against the laws of most countries in the world by far with him, then what rights they have to complain when others do the same thing, but in a less socially awkward.</p>
<p>Of course, it is certainly true that copyright infringement is illegal. By definition, therefore, it is illegal for people use P2P file sharing software to download music and movie files protected by copyright. However, the offense is the greater: to download a file to copyright or deliberate attack against the drug laws in your country of residence or country you visit, and escape punishment because you are &#8221; a star &#8220;?</p>
<p>Most of us know the answer to this question, as long as the stars by the law, they should stop us grumble and keeps it closed, until they meet the requirements. Once you, so do we. So far, but the morality of the situation is that we try our best to help them in their income to a minimum, so that they can no longer afford to buy drugs with money. We do not want to pay more for their garbage music, and let us be honest, the most new music these days is total crap until they own, their actions and start to our children an example of the pride of their own children.</p>
<p>In the meantime, we will continue our best, movies and music throughout our network. We are members of associations, and as such, we have the well-being at heart. Indeed, without them we would not hear or see. We have nothing to copy all or illegally. If they are clean, then we are to clean.</p>
<p>We have lines, and lines to stay together to ensure that we assist these drugs stars led to the reduction of resources for the purchase of drugs and alcohol, so that rather in the situation, Fit for music and movies for our children&#8217;s future clean and working with clear ideas. It is the desire to be welcomed. We are a social service, and it will not criminal.</p>
<p>This is why P2P should be with public subsidies and not hunted. We are not only good for the stars using the errors of their possibilities, but the support of the future of children in our respective countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tzgqt.com/peer-to-peer-file-sharing-ethics.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
